AI & ML interests

None defined yet.

Recent Activity

burtenshaw  updated a collection about 20 hours ago
UCB AgentBeats Hackathon (OpenEnv special track)
burtenshaw  updated a collection about 20 hours ago
UCB AgentBeats Hackathon (OpenEnv special track)
burtenshaw  updated a collection about 20 hours ago
UCB AgentBeats Hackathon (OpenEnv special track)
View all activity

sergiopaniego 
posted an update about 18 hours ago
view post
Post
65
Frontier agents are this good partly because the model was trained inside the very harness it ships with.

NVIDIA's new paper "Polar: Agentic RL on Any Harness at Scale" brings that recipe to the open: it turns coding harnesses like Codex, Claude Code, Qwen Code or Pi into RL training environments without touching their internals.

The core idea: every agent, however complex or closed, talks to a model through an API, so they put a proxy there. The harness runs exactly like in production while the proxy records prompts, sampled token ids and logprobs. Trajectories get rebuilt outside, token faithful, so gradients hit the exact tokens the policy sampled.

The gains are consistent across all four harnesses. Same Qwen3.5-4B, plain GRPO, evaluated on SWE-Bench Verified:

Codex 3.8 → 26.4 (+22.6)
Claude Code 29.8 → 34.6 (+4.8)
Qwen Code 34.6 → 35.2 (+0.6)
Pi 34.2 → 40.4 (+6.2)

The biggest gains appear on unfamiliar execution paths, Codex being the clearest case. The takeaway: you are not just training a model, you are training the model + harness system.

Two engineering pieces make it work at scale. Async worker pools isolate container boots (CPU), agent execution (GPU) and long tail test runs, so slow runtimes never block the GPUs. And prefix merging stitches hundreds of captured API calls back into contiguous traces: 5.4x faster trainer updates and rollout GPUs at 88% utilization.

It also doubles as an SFT data factory: 504 test verified agent traces from a 122B teacher, multi-turn conversations averaging 104 messages each, coming to the Hub under Apache 2.0 (release pending review).

Paper authors: Binfeng Xu, Hao Zhang, Shaokun Zhang, Songyang Han, Mingjie Liu, Jian Hu, Shizhe Diao, Zhenghui Jin, Yunheng Zou, Michael Demoret, Jan Kautz and Yi Dong.

> Paper: Polar: Agentic RL on Any Harness at Scale (2605.24220)
> Code: https://github.com/NVIDIA-NeMo/ProRL-Agent-Server
> Training data: NovaSky-AI/SkyRL-v0-293-data
sergiopaniego 
posted an update 3 days ago
view post
Post
128
The recording from our talk: "From Responses To Trajectories: Multi-Turn and Multi-Environment RL" from PyTorch Conf Europe is live!

@kashif and I covered the latest advances in multi-turn GRPO in TRL: trajectories, tool use, envs, and agentic post-training at scale

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPBeXFntJSU
sergiopaniego 
posted an update 3 days ago
view post
Post
99
how do you sync a trillion parameter model every RL step without a shared cluster? we just wrote a blog about it, led by @aminediroHF

what I like the most is the way it proves you can use the Hub for basically everything 🧐 → trainer on one machine, vLLM in a HF Space, the wordle env in another HF Space and weights going through a Hub Bucket. no shared cluster, just HTTPS

it works because ~99% of bf16 weights don't change between RL steps so you only sync the diff. 1.2 GB to 25 MB of payload per step

https://huggingface.co/blog/delta-weight-sync
sergiopaniego 
posted an update 4 days ago
view post
Post
2265
most multi-turn RL loops have a silent bug: you decode the model's output to detect tool calls, then re-tokenize the conversation for the next turn. BPE isn't invertible, so decode then re-encode can land on different ids. gradient ends up on tokens the model never sampled. no crash, just quietly wrong math and broken training

@qgallouedec wrote a super educational blog on MITO (message-in, token-out) vs TITO (token-in, token-out) and how you might fix the problem above

go read it 🤓

https://qgallouedec-tito.hf.space/