effectivity

#22
by SolsticeAI - opened

hey not to sound sussed out but can i get like more clear effectiveness readings

Hi, fair question! Here’s what we measured. Everything is on a held-out set the model never saw in training: 210 English AI drafts across 18 genres, written by GLM, GPT and Claude.

Originality.ai, strictest setting (2026-10-02, bf16 weights): 199 of 210 rewrites judged human (95%). The previous release got 184 of 210 (88%).
Per GGUF file, same 60 drafts: Q8_0 had 7 of 60 flagged, Q3 had 4 of 60, IQ2_XS had 0 of 60.
Pangram is our weak spot. In our small internal tests, everyday text like emails and forum posts usually passes, but formal reports and academic writing mostly get flagged. That’s what we’re working on for the next version.

Results depend a lot on the detector and the kind of text. Casual writing does best, formal reports and papers are hardest. The full method and numbers are in the Evaluation section of the README. If you tell me which detector and what kind of text you’re testing, I can tell you what to expect.

thx so much

Sign up or log in to comment