Are IMO results reliable?
https://huggingface.co/inclusionAI/Ring-1T/discussions/5
https://github.com/inclusionAI/AWorld/issues/520
The person raising the question（github） had previously received the Silver Medal at the 58th International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO).
I've noticed that your model continue to promote IMO results, but many people have questions about them, and you haven't seemed to have a formal response.
Thanks for your question.
You can check this address for more detailed information： https://github.com/inclusionAI/Ring-V2.5/tree/main/examples
Best regards.
@ZjWen
Thank you for your reply.
From your perspective, what is the current level of your proofs for math problems in the IMO? Have you had a professional evaluation?
Does it truly reaches the gold medal level you claim?
As a contestant myself (but not an IMO participant), I have seen your proofs and noticed comments from previous IMO winners regarding your outputs, hence this question.
The evaluation for IMO25 and CMO25 was confirmed through cross-verification by multiple professional CMO gold medalists, with each problem having an analysis and a final judgment.