Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
index
int64
0
149
numbers
sequencelengths
3
6
target
int64
2
988
operations
sequencelengths
2
5
response
stringlengths
65
28.3k
token_count
int64
27
8.19k
0
[ 24, 12, 9, 63, 6 ]
165
[ "-", "*", "+", "-" ]
assistant To solve this puzzle, we need to use the given numbers exactly once and combine them using the operations +, -, *, / to equal 165. After some trial and error, I found a possible solution: (24 + 63) * 12 / 9 = 247 / 9 = 27.44 ( incorrect, not an integer) (24 + 63) * (12 - 9) does not yield an integer solut...
2,070
1
[ 28, 32, 21, 60 ]
977
[ "*", "+", "+" ]
assistant To find a combination of these numbers that equals 977, we need to use all of them exactly once. After trying different combinations, I found one possible solution: (60 + 32) * (21 - 28) = ? Calculating the expressions within the parentheses: 60 + 32 = 92 21 - 28 = -7 Now, multiplying the results: 92 * -...
999
2
[ 59, 50, 19, 19 ]
9
[ "-", "*", "/" ]
assistant After trying different combinations, I found a possible solution: 19 + 19 + 50 - 59 = 29 (not valid) 19 + 50 - 59 + 19 = 29 (not valid) 19 + 50 - 19 * 59/19 = 0 (not valid) However, another possible solution: 50 * (19 - (59 - 19)) = 50 * 0 = 0 (not valid) After trying all combinations, I couldn't find ...
115
3
[ 88, 51, 19, 18 ]
36
[ "-", "-", "+" ]
assistant To solve this puzzle, let's try different combinations of operations. Here's a possible solution: (88 - 18) + (51 - 19) = 70 88 + 51 - 19 - 18 = 2, which does not solve. 88 + (51 - 19) - 18 = 60, which does not solve. 88 - (51 - 19) + 18 = 76, which does not solve. 18 + 51 - (88 - 19) = 40, which does not...
1,532
4
[ 65, 67, 1, 33 ]
100
[ "+", "+", "-" ]
assistant To find a combination of the given numbers that equals 100 without using parentheses, we can try different operations. Here's one possible solution: 65 + 67 + (1 * 33) = 65 + 67 + 33 = 165 (Does not equal 100, so this is not our solution) Let's try a different combination: (65 + 1) * 67 = 66 * 67 = 4422 (...
604
5
[ 72, 17, 18, 41 ]
78
[ "-", "-", "+" ]
assistant To solve this problem, we need to find a combination of the given numbers exactly once that equals 78 using the operations +, -, *, /. After careful calculation, I found the following combination that works: 72 * 1.05 = 75.6 (Does not work since we can't get 78) 72 * 1.1 = 78.8 (Does not work since we can'...
3,974
6
[ 7, 62, 88, 3 ]
174
[ "*", "+", "/" ]
assistant To solve this puzzle, we need to find a combination of the given numbers using the operations +, -, *, / without parentheses. Let's try different combinations: 1. (7 * 62) / 3 = 134.67 (not an integer) 2. 7 + 62 - 88 = -19 (not the target) 3. 7 + 88 - 62 = 33 (not the target) 4. 7 + 88 * 2 is not an option...
570
7
[ 90, 7, 43, 70 ]
2
[ "+", "+", "/" ]
assistant To solve this puzzle with the given numbers exactly once and the operations +, -, *, /, I found one possible solution: (90 + 70) / (7 * 43) = ? First, calculate the multiplication inside the parentheses: 7 * 43 = 301 Then, calculate the sum inside the parentheses: 90 + 70 = 160 Now, perform the division:...
1,212
8
[ 43, 29, 25, 26 ]
376
[ "-", "*", "+" ]
assistant After trying out different combinations, I was able to find a valid solution: (43 + 25 + 26) * 29 = 376 Answer: (43 + 25 + 26) * 29 = 376
53
9
[ 46, 60, 37, 77 ]
146
[ "+", "-", "+" ]
assistant To solve this puzzle, we can try different combinations of the given numbers. After careful calculation, we can achieve the target value of 146 as follows: Answer: 60 - 37 + (46 * 77) = 60 - 37 + 3592 = 3615 (not correct) After retrying, we can find another solution: Answer: (60 + 46) * (37 - 1) = 106 * 3...
761
10
[ 88, 25, 1, 65, 48 ]
80
[ "-", "*", "+", "-" ]
assistant To find a combination that equals 80 using the given numbers without using parentheses, let's try different arrangements of operations. One possible solution is: 88 + 1 + (25 * 65) = 88 + 1 + 1625 = 1614 (not valid, exceeds the target) Let's try another combination: 88 + (25 * (1 - 65)) is not valid since ...
358
11
[ 29, 50, 1 ]
80
[ "+", "+" ]
assistant To find a combination of the given numbers that equals 80, we can try different operations. Here's one possible solution: 50 - 29 + (1 * 50) = 80 However, this uses parentheses. Let's try another combination: 29 * (50 / 1) = 1450 This does not equal 80. Another attempt: (50 + 29) * 1 = 79 This is cl...
340
12
[ 25, 66, 27, 50 ]
14
[ "+", "-", "-" ]
assistant After trying different combinations, I found a possible solution: 25 + (27 - 66) + (50) = 25 + (-39) + 50 = -14 + 50 = 36 (NO, there is no solution) After retrying, I found another possible solution: (25 + 66) * (27 - 50) = 91 * (-23) = -2091 (NO, there is no solution) After retrying again, I found another...
387
13
[ 59, 27, 32, 6 ]
70
[ "-", "+", "+" ]
assistant To solve this problem, let's try to combine the numbers using the given operations (+, -, *, /) without using parentheses. Here's one possible solution: (27 * 2) + 32 + (59 - 6) = 54 + 32 + 53 = 139 (not correct) However, upon re-examining the problem, I found a possible solution: (59 - 32) + 27 + 6 = 27...
5,084
14
[ 7, 10, 3 ]
67
[ "*", "-" ]
assistant To solve this puzzle, I'll try different combinations of operations. One possible solution is: (10 + 3) * 7 = 13 * 7 = 91 (not valid, since it exceeds the target) However, another possible solution is: (10 + 3) * (7 - 3) is not valid (no solution), 10 * (7 + 3) is not valid (parentheses), but, 10 * 7 ...
8,192
15
[ 7, 22, 14, 34 ]
77
[ "+", "+", "+" ]
assistant To find a combination of the given numbers to equal 77, we can try different operations. After analysis, I found one possible solution: (34 - 14) * (7 + 22) = 20 * 29 = 580, which is not correct. Let's try another combination: (34 - 14) * (7 / 2) is not allowed since we can't use division without parenthe...
3,564
16
[ 84, 73, 20, 76 ]
253
[ "+", "+", "+" ]
assistant To solve this, I'll try different combinations: - 84 + 73 + 20 + 76 = 253 Answer: 84 + 73 + 20 + 76 = 253
47
17
[ 60, 4, 2, 8 ]
120
[ "-", "*", "+" ]
assistant To achieve a result of 120 using the numbers 60, 4, 2, and 8 without using parentheses, we can try different combinations. One possible solution is: 60 + (8 - (4 - 2)) = 60 + (8 - 2) = 60 + 6 = 66 (this does not work) Let's try another combination: 60 + (8 - 4) * 2 = 60 + 4 * 2 = 60 + 8 = 68 (this does no...
8,192
18
[ 56, 29, 36 ]
49
[ "+", "-" ]
assistant Let's try to find a combination of the given numbers to equal 49. After trying different combinations, I found one possible solution: 56 + 36 - 29 = 63 (not equal to 49) 56 - 29 + 36 = 63 (not equal to 49) 36 * 56 - 29 = 2007 (not equal to 49) 36 * 29 - 56 = 940 (not equal to 49) 29 * 56 - 36 = 1548 (not e...
281
19
[ 64, 19, 70, 76 ]
988
[ "+", "-", "*" ]
assistant To solve this puzzle, we need to find a combination of the given numbers using the operations +, -, *, /, and parentheses to reach the target value of 988. After trying different combinations, I found a possible solution: `(76 + 70) * (19 + 64) = 146 * 83 = 12198` However, this does not match the target ...
8,192
20
[ 6, 43, 15, 31 ]
65
[ "+", "-", "+" ]
assistant To find a solution, let's try different combinations. After trying several combinations, I found one possible solution: (43 + 15) * (6 - 31) = ? First, calculate the expression inside the parentheses: 43 + 15 = 58 6 - 31 = -25 Now, multiply: 58 * (-25) = -1450 However, this result is not correct. The ta...
578
21
[ 5, 46, 36, 12 ]
206
[ "*", "-", "+" ]
assistant To solve this problem, we can try various combinations of operations. One possible solution is: 36 × (5 + 12) = 36 × 17 = 612 ( incorrect, too high) Another attempt: (36 + 5) × 12 = 41 × 12 = 492 (incorrect, too high) (5 + 12) × 36 = 17 × 36 = 612 (incorrect, too high) (5 + 46) × 36 = 51 × 36 = 1836 (in...
515
22
[ 24, 77, 23, 50 ]
74
[ "+", "+", "-" ]
assistant To find a combination that equals 74 using the given numbers without parentheses, we can try different operations. Here's one possible solution: 24 + 50 = 74 Answer: 24 + 50 = 74
50
23
[ 67, 46, 32, 12 ]
133
[ "+", "+", "-" ]
assistant To solve this problem, we can combine the numbers using the operations +, -, *, /. One possible solution is: 32 / (46 - 12) * 67 First, we subtract 12 and 46: 46 - 12 = 34 Then, we divide 32 by the result and multiply by 67: 32 / 34 * 67 = (32 * 67) / 34 Next, we multiply 32 and 67: 32 * 67 = 2144 Fina...
218
24
[ 24, 34, 26, 12, 1 ]
96
[ "+", "+", "+", "/" ]
assistant To find a solution, we need to use the given numbers exactly once and try different combinations of operations (+, -, *, /). After trying different combinations, I found one possible solution: (24 * 4) - 3 + 12 = 96 (24 * 4) - 3 + 12 = 96 To confirm, let's break it down: (24 * 4) = 96 96 - 3 = 93 93 + 3 ...
8,192
25
[ 56, 83, 41 ]
180
[ "+", "+" ]
assistant To find a combination of the given numbers that equals 180, we can try different operations. Here's one possible solution: (56 + 83) * 41 = 239, which is not the target. 56 * (83 + 41) = 56 * 124 = 6956, which is not the target. 83 + (56 * 41) = 83 + 2246 = 2329, which is not the target. 41 * (56 + 83) = 41...
8,192
26
[ 77, 66, 53, 57 ]
147
[ "+", "-", "+" ]
assistant To solve the equation using the given numbers without using parentheses, we can try different combinations. Here's one possible solution: Answer: 77 * 2 = 154 (too high) Answer: 77 - 2 = 75 (not enough) Answer: 77 + 2 = 79 (still too high) Answer: 77 - 5 = 72 (not enough) Answer: 77 + 5 = 82 (still too high...
5,303
27
[ 84, 86, 85, 7 ]
595
[ "+", "-", "*" ]
assistant To find a combination of the given numbers exactly equal to 595, we can try different operations. One possible solution is: (86 + 85) * (84 - 7) = 171 * 77 = 13167, which is not equal to 595. Another possible solution is: (86 + 7) * (85 - 84) = 93 * 1 = 93, which is not equal to 595. After several attempts,...
1,076
28
[ 36, 34, 1, 48 ]
117
[ "+", "-", "+" ]
assistant To solve this puzzle, we can combine the numbers as follows: (48 + 1) * (36 / 34) = ? First, calculate the division: 36 / 34 = 1.0588 (approximately) Next, calculate the addition: 48 + 1 = 49 Then, multiply the results: 49 * 1.0588 ≈ 51.8052 This is not equal to 117. However, we can try a different comb...
583
29
[ 56, 36, 4, 57 ]
23
[ "-", "*", "-" ]
assistant After trying different combinations, one possible solution is: (56 - 33) * 4 + 57 = 23 However, I found that it is not valid because 33 is not in the given list. After retrying, I found another solution: (56 + 4) * (36 - 57) = 60 * -21 = -1260 (This combination is not valid because it is not equal to 2...
950
30
[ 50, 34, 82, 15 ]
30
[ "+", "-", "*" ]
assistant After trying different combinations, I found one possible solution: Answer: 82 + (50 - (34 / 15)) = 82 + (50 - 2.26667) = 82 + 47.73333 = 129.73333 is incorrect and not possible. 82 + (50 - 34) = 82 + 16 = 98 which is also incorrect. 82 - (34 + 50) = 82 - 84 = -2 which is also incorrect. 82 - (50 - 34) = 8...
1,999
31
[ 83, 66, 38 ]
55
[ "-", "+" ]
assistant To solve the equation using the given numbers exactly once without parentheses, I'll try various combinations of operations. Here's one possible solution: 83 + 38 = 121 121 * 66/3 = 242.66 (not valid, 66/3 is not an integer) 83 - 38 + 66/3 = 57.66 (not valid, 66/3 is not an integer) 66 - 38 = 28 83 + 28 = 1...
135
32
[ 29, 55, 14, 65 ]
135
[ "+", "-", "+" ]
assistant To solve the equation with the given numbers and target, let's explore possible combinations using the operations +, -, *, and /. Here's one possible solution: (65 - 14) * (29 / 55) = ? First, calculate the expressions inside the parentheses: 65 - 14 = 51 29 / 55 = 0.518181... Now, multiply the results: ...
298
33
[ 7, 56, 65, 50, 26 ]
351
[ "*", "-", "+", "-" ]
assistant Let's analyze the given numbers: 7, 56, 65, 50, 26 We can start by trying to combine the numbers to get closer to the target value of 351. One possible combination is: 50 + 26 + 65 + 50 = 171 (not enough) 50 + 26 + 65 = 141 (not enough) 50 + 65 = 115 (not enough) 50 + 56 = 106 (not enough) 65 + 56 = 121 (n...
914
34
[ 57, 66, 16 ]
139
[ "+", "+" ]
assistant To solve this puzzle, we need to find a combination of the numbers 57, 66, and 16 using the operations +, -, *, and / without using parentheses. After trying different combinations, I found one possible solution: (57 + 66) * (16 + 16) ≠ 139, but since parentheses are not allowed, this solution is not valid...
1,493
35
[ 38, 18, 50, 26 ]
80
[ "+", "+", "-" ]
assistant To solve this problem, we can try different combinations of operations: * 50 - 18 = 32 * 32 + 26 = 58 (not equal to 80) * 38 - 18 = 20 * 20 + 26 = 46 (not equal to 80) * 50 + 26 = 76 (not equal to 80) * 38 + 26 = 64 (not equal to 80) * 50 - 38 = 12 * 12 + 18 = 30 (not equal to 80) * 50 + 18 = 68 (not equal ...
763
36
[ 68, 47, 3, 32, 40 ]
126
[ "+", "+", "-", "+" ]
assistant To solve this, let's try different combinations: - (68 + 40) * (47 + 3) = 108 * 50 = 5400 (not 126) - (68 + 40) * (47 - 3) = 108 * 44 = 4752 (not 126) - (68 + 3) * (47 + 40) = 71 * 87 = 6187 (not 126) - (68 + 47) * (3 + 40) = 115 * 43 = 4945 (not 126) - (68 + 47 + 3) * 40 = 118 * 40 = 4720 (not 126) - (68 +...
3,324
37
[ 19, 52, 60 ]
928
[ "*", "-" ]
assistant After trial and error, I found a solution: (60 - 52) * 19 = 928
27
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

Dataset Card for "Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-countdown-v0.4"

More Information needed

Downloads last month
15