Text Generation
Transformers
Safetensors
gpt_oss
code
sft
reasoning
fine-tuned
java
gpt-oss
bf16
conversational
Eval Results (legacy)
🇪🇺 Region: EU
Instructions to use SonarSource/SonarSweep-java-gpt-oss-20b with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- Transformers
How to use SonarSource/SonarSweep-java-gpt-oss-20b with Transformers:
# Use a pipeline as a high-level helper from transformers import pipeline pipe = pipeline("text-generation", model="SonarSource/SonarSweep-java-gpt-oss-20b") messages = [ {"role": "user", "content": "Who are you?"}, ] pipe(messages)# Load model directly from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("SonarSource/SonarSweep-java-gpt-oss-20b") model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("SonarSource/SonarSweep-java-gpt-oss-20b", device_map="auto") messages = [ {"role": "user", "content": "Who are you?"}, ] inputs = tokenizer.apply_chat_template( messages, add_generation_prompt=True, tokenize=True, return_dict=True, return_tensors="pt", ).to(model.device) outputs = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=40) print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0][inputs["input_ids"].shape[-1]:])) - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
- Local Apps Settings
- vLLM
How to use SonarSource/SonarSweep-java-gpt-oss-20b with vLLM:
Install from pip and serve model
# Install vLLM from pip: pip install vllm # Start the vLLM server: vllm serve "SonarSource/SonarSweep-java-gpt-oss-20b" # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:8000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "SonarSource/SonarSweep-java-gpt-oss-20b", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }'Use Docker
docker model run hf.co/SonarSource/SonarSweep-java-gpt-oss-20b
- SGLang
How to use SonarSource/SonarSweep-java-gpt-oss-20b with SGLang:
Install from pip and serve model
# Install SGLang from pip: pip install sglang # Start the SGLang server: python3 -m sglang.launch_server \ --model-path "SonarSource/SonarSweep-java-gpt-oss-20b" \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 30000 # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "SonarSource/SonarSweep-java-gpt-oss-20b", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }'Use Docker images
docker run --gpus all \ --shm-size 32g \ -p 30000:30000 \ -v ~/.cache/huggingface:/root/.cache/huggingface \ --env "HF_TOKEN=<secret>" \ --ipc=host \ lmsysorg/sglang:latest \ python3 -m sglang.launch_server \ --model-path "SonarSource/SonarSweep-java-gpt-oss-20b" \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 30000 # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "SonarSource/SonarSweep-java-gpt-oss-20b", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }' - Docker Model Runner
How to use SonarSource/SonarSweep-java-gpt-oss-20b with Docker Model Runner:
docker model run hf.co/SonarSource/SonarSweep-java-gpt-oss-20b
Commit ·
a9e021e
1
Parent(s): f62a688
Update the model card to refer to the report PDF
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -217,6 +217,8 @@ We trained LoRA adapters across all linear layers of the experts and attention b
|
|
| 217 |
|
| 218 |
## Evaluation
|
| 219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 220 |
### Code Quality
|
| 221 |
|
| 222 |
We used SonarQube to evaluate the quality, verbosity, and complexity of Java code generated for the [ComplexCodeEval](https://github.com/ComplexCodeEval/ComplexCodeEval) and [MultiPL-E Java](https://huggingface.co/datasets/nuprl/MultiPL-E/viewer/humaneval-java) benchmarks.
|
|
@@ -225,7 +227,7 @@ The fine-tuned and base models achieve a similar pass@1 metric for code generati
|
|
| 225 |
|
| 226 |
The fine-tuned model achieves this metric while generating fewer lines of code.
|
| 227 |
|
| 228 |
-
For code quality, we see a dramatic reduction in both the number and density of Sonar issues, split among bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code smells (see the [Glossary](#glossary) for definitions).
|
| 229 |
|
| 230 |
| Metric | Base Model | Fine-tuned Model |
|
| 231 |
|--------|------------|------------------|
|
|
|
|
| 217 |
|
| 218 |
## Evaluation
|
| 219 |
|
| 220 |
+
For a comprehensive analysis with detailed metrics and additional comparisons between the base model and fine-tuned model, see our [detailed evaluation report](https://huggingface.co/SonarSource/SonarSweep-java-gpt-oss-20b/blob/main/report.pdf).
|
| 221 |
+
|
| 222 |
### Code Quality
|
| 223 |
|
| 224 |
We used SonarQube to evaluate the quality, verbosity, and complexity of Java code generated for the [ComplexCodeEval](https://github.com/ComplexCodeEval/ComplexCodeEval) and [MultiPL-E Java](https://huggingface.co/datasets/nuprl/MultiPL-E/viewer/humaneval-java) benchmarks.
|
|
|
|
| 227 |
|
| 228 |
The fine-tuned model achieves this metric while generating fewer lines of code.
|
| 229 |
|
| 230 |
+
For code quality, we see a dramatic reduction in both the number and density of Sonar issues, split among bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code smells (see the [Glossary](#glossary) for definitions). For granular breakdowns by issue type and severity, refer to the [detailed evaluation report](https://huggingface.co/SonarSource/SonarSweep-java-gpt-oss-20b/blob/main/report.pdf).
|
| 231 |
|
| 232 |
| Metric | Base Model | Fine-tuned Model |
|
| 233 |
|--------|------------|------------------|
|